Search results for ''...


Sorry, there were no results

Get in touch

Get in touch

  • Overview

    At 6am on the morning of the birth, Ms W experienced a spontaneous rupture of her membranes and went into spontaneous labour. Ms W was admitted to Salisbury District Hospital Labour Ward where foetal monitoring was carried out.

    At 09:30, Ms W was advised that she needed to have a CTG after a bleed had occurred. Full dilation was noted and the foetal heart rate was decreasing, however there was no crisis at this time and everything was relatively in order. The registrar gave Ms W twenty minutes to deliver naturally, after which he said he would need to use ventouse to help deliver the baby.

    The registrar then decided to use Neville Barnes forceps, despite a query by the midwife who was also in attendance. Despite being entirely inappropriate to use these kinds of forceps in this scenario; The registrar used them to rotate Baby W’s head.

    After two pulls with the forceps, the descent was still not achieved. At this point an episiotomy was performed with the second pull, in a misguided attempt to guarantee delivery with the third pull. This was unsuccessful, therefore after the third pull, the episiotomy was extended.

    When the fourth pull took place, the registrar requested the McRoberts’ position, which would ordinarily not be required for an imminent delivery.

    The midwife noted that the forceps “did not appear to lock” and also saw the registrar pull on the forceps when there was no contraction at all.

    When Baby W was delivered with the fifth pull, the delivery was brutal and caused Baby W to suffer scarring on her head, including a 7mm scar on her face. This scarring will likely pose a permanent disfigurement for the rest of Baby W’s life.

    Ms W contacted Jonathan Herbert at Thomson Snell & Passmore LLP on behalf of her daughter.

    Jonathan investigated the claim and highlighted numerous breaches by the doctor; including a suggestion (according to the instructed obstetric expert) that The registrar had possibly amended his clinical note at a later date to cover up an initial finding.

    Jonathan successfully negotiated an out of court settlement to compensate the claimant for the scarring to her head.

    Jonathan Herbert specialises in birth injury cases.  If you would like to ask Jonathan a question about a potential case, or if you have a general query about any personal injury, contact Jonathan at Thomson Snell & Passmore solicitors on 01892 701226 in confidence.

  • Related Services

    Clinical Negligence Compensation Claims

    We have one of the most well-established and experienced clinical negligence teams in the country. Our clinical negligence lawyers have a reputation for winning complex medical negligence cases and we have helped thousands of people claim compensation.   

    Obstetrics claims

    If you suffered an obstetrics injury during pregnancy or childbirth and think it was caused by medical negligence, you may be able to make a compensation claim. We have in-depth experience with obstetrics claims. Contact one of our specialist lawyers for a free initial consultation to find out if we can investigate your case with the financial security of a no win no fee agreement.

    Compensation claims on behalf of children

    If your child has been affected by medical negligence in a hospital or GP surgery the incident should be fully and independently investigated. We have successfully made compensation claims for children injured in a wide range of circumstances.

    Birth injury claims

    Birth injury claims on behalf of children are among the most complex of medical negligence claims. We are specialist in this area and have vast experience of dealing with compensation claims for birth injuries sustained in hospitals throughout London, Kent, Sussex and the South East.

Get in touch

^
Jargon Buster